There is a timeless tide that
subterraneously links disparate events with genetic memory, intermittently
spouting through fissures created by seismic shifts in the segueing of
civilisations. The reasons for these outbreaks are found in the cultural
genomes of a people, and create icons and demons.
A R Rahman is a national treasure.
When he sings Vande Mataram, the sheer emotion in his voice transforms it into
a choreography of patriotism. Only the most retarded of bigots can issue a
fatwa against him. The VHP’s invitation of ghar wapsi to Rahman, however, and
the suggestion that he converted only for commercial reasons are
unsophisticated expressions of nationalism.
‘Jai ho’ has nothing to do with
banning meat either, using the Jain festival, Paryushan, as an excuse. In fact,
during that period, Jains don’t consume even green vegetables. Someone missed
that point. The meat ban and renaming of Aurangzeb Road became judicial issues
and nearly polarised communities. Cancelling the Eid holiday in Rajasthan,
which the state government later denied, was some babu’s misguided idea of
currying favour. Secularists are ruining their vocal chords over incidents like
these, but do not bother to turn back the pages of history to understand the
reasons why they occur.
Millennia before Newton, action and
reaction has been the essence of Hindu knowledge. It established karma as a
diminishing return and that the aim of a soul is to become one with the
Supreme. Almost all major religions wait for Judgment Day. In Hinduism, there
is only salvation.
This spiritual code of ancient
Hindus was violated, and the seeds of provocation and polarisation were sown in
636 CE, when the Umayid Uthman Abul As Al Sakifi, the governor of Bahrain and
Oman, sent his navy to attack Thane, near Mumbai. In 724 AD, Junaid b. Abd Al
Rahman Al Marri killed Raja Jai Singh in battle, attacked Southern Punjab and
the Kangra valley. He was the first to destroy the Somnath Temple. Starting in
1001, Mahmud Ghazni despoiled temples in Varanasi, Mathura, Ujjain, Maheshwar,
Jwalamukhi, Somnath and Dwarka. He massacred the defenders of Somnath Temple
which he looted and destroyed. Then came the Delhi Sultanate, the Mamluks, the
Lodis, Timur who razed Delhi, which lay uninhabited for decades after the
pogrom, and the Mughals. Each one of them imposed Islam violently on India,
converting Hindus through bribes and threats, mercilessly killing those who
refused. Millions perished. The invaders murdered Sikh gurus. Rajput women
committed sati rather than fall into their hands. Aurangzeb and Shah Jehan were
among the worst, wiping out temples, imposing religious taxes and changing food
habits. The British were maestros of communal polarisation. The Congress wooed
Muslims with sops and created vote banks. Regional parties and the Communists
too did the same.
The cumulative force of historical
memory breached these fragile banks of time in May 2014. For the first time,
there was an unambiguous democratic Hindu mandate to rule India. It may be wise
to argue that times have changed, and development is the only valid mantra. But
history has a long memory. It is a difficult dragon to ride and Narendra Modi’s
biggest challenge is to hold its reins in place, until swachh Bharat becomes a
global industrial and military power. Till then, history will keep retaliating
against the past at the cost of the future.
ravi@newindianexpress.com
No comments:
Post a Comment